Q Research Software

When clicking on a table and using Right-Click > Sort by > Lables >Descending/Ascending the user would like some type of smart option so the sort behaves the same way as the rule - Sort Rows (Automatically Updates When Data Changes) and excludes special cases such as Don't Know, Other/Specify, All of these, or None of these. Note, the rule doesn't work as expected bcause it was designed to be used with mutually exclusive categories.

Allow shading after using rule to split cells by statistics into different columns

Would like to add nets to many variables at a time - having a rule to specify the nets to be created in a table would be useful for this purpose.

There's no current function to specifically show the Base n in the row label (we do have tools for doing this in crosstabs for column headers). Â

A user has set up specific colors for each level of significance (90% and 95%) as see in the screenshot below. They are using the Significance Testing in Tables > Color Significant Cells and would like to color only the cells that are significant at the 95% level, not both 90% and 95%. It would be nice to give the users an option to determine which level of significance they want to highlight.

We could make it easier on our users if we improved the Move Data > Move Variables to New Position QScript, particularly when selecting where to move the variables. Currently, users are presented a dropdown of all of the variables in the project to determine where the selected variables should be moved after. See screenshot. We could make this easier in at least a couple of ways: Users can currently start typing the name of the variable where they want to move things after, however, it doesn't allow dynamic typing to find the variable name. Instead, it only picks up the "last" letter entered. For example, I started typing "Preferred", but the dropdown jumps to the first "R" variable as I continue typing. Allow users to enter a row number for where they want to move the variable(s). For example, allow them to enter "51" if they want to move the variable to just after 51.

A user is trying to mirror Quantum tables using Q and then functions available, where they want to rename the base text to reflect what the data is based on. See the screenshot for an example.

When using the Function Automate > Browse Online Library > Create New Variables > Automatically Combine Categories > By Geography > Australia > To Local Government Areas (LGA) the user would like to to extend ABS classification and include Greater Capital City Statistical Areas (GCCSA_CODE) as well.

The user would like a custom rule added to the Online Library which allows column comparison letters to appear to the right of the statistic in a cell. This helps with their desired export formatting. The end result would appear as shown in the attached table. Custom rule can be found here: https://numbersint.sharepoint.com/_layouts/OneNote.aspx?id=%2FShared%20Documents%2FQ%20Customer%20Support&wd=target%28Rules%2C%20QScripts%2C%20and%20R%20OH%20MY.one%7CDC455893-5530-4516-B815-DE260AD832A3%2FPut%20Column%20Comparison%20to%20right%20inside%20cell%7CBF5882F5-AACC-494E-ACA2-6486FAE7E0EF%2F%29 onenote: https://numbersint.sharepoint.com/Shared%20Documents/Q%20Customer%20Support/Rules,%20QScripts,%20and%20R%20OH%20MY.one#Put%20Column%20Comparison%20to%20right%20inside%20cell&section-id={DC455893-5530-4516-B815-DE260AD832A3}&page-id={BF5882F5-AACC-494E-ACA2-6486FAE7E0EF}&end

A user has a pick any grid variable set and they wanted to merge specific rows (ex. first thing in the morning, early evening, before bed, etc.) to get a view on respondents fell out for the time of day dimension of the grid. They can use the any of calculation for each set of combinations and then turn it into a pick one multi. The user was pleased with this approach, but later followed up with: _The only thing is that it would be super time consuming if there were more variables to merge, but I'm sure there are other ways of achieving that if the scenario arises._ Would it be possible to set up template for replication for something like this, giving the user options of where to group and run the any of calculation? This would allow them to run the steps a bit quicker, especially if they have multiple instances of needing to go through the process or a larger grid structure.