Customer states: “I've had the opportunity to use the new R TURF feature, and I wanted to share some feedback where I found this feature less efficient than the old TURF. I particularly liked how the old TURF would let me run portfolios of increasing size in one output (i.e. portfolios of 1, 2, 3, and so on). I really liked the summary at the top of the strongest portfolio of each size, and that then I could show the top 10 or so strongest portfolios of each size underneath. That would usually produce everything I need in one output.

In the current R feature, I seem to have to select exactly how many features I want in each portfolio. This makes it fiddly for me to readily get the data to show at what point there are diminishing returns to including extra items in the portfolio. I rarely encounter situations where I have a fixed portfolio size I am trying to optimize, meaning I usually start off analysis by looking to understand how big the portfolio should be which is more fiddly with the R version.”